A new paper points to an unexpected source for scientific censorship: scientists themselves. According to the paper, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences as a ...

Rizqy Amelia Zein does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond ...

Much published science and the "knowledge" resulting from it is likely wrong and sends researchers chasing false leads. Without research integrity, we don’t know what we know, so it is incumbent on ...

When a group of researchers at Northwestern University uncovered evidence of widespread—and growing—research fraud in scientific publishing, editors at some academic journals weren’t exactly rushing ...

Thomas Merritt receives funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Teresa Rzezniczak does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or ...

Innovation has always been an engine of success for companies. However, coming up with novel ideas can be challenging. The process of ideation requires creativity, experimentation and out-of-the-box ...

In Part 1 of this series, we presented evidence that a not insignificant amount of published science and the “knowledge” resulting from it is wrong. There are many reasons, including experimental ...